<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abstract Photography: New Concepts Happen All the Time!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photography.savvy-cafe.com/2008/05/abstract-photography-new-concepts-happen-all-the-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photography.savvy-cafe.com/2008/05/abstract-photography-new-concepts-happen-all-the-time/</link>
	<description>Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:48:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conny</title>
		<link>http://photography.savvy-cafe.com/2008/05/abstract-photography-new-concepts-happen-all-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Conny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photography.savvy-cafe.com/?p=45#comment-10</guid>
		<description>heya,

....a glass of water is even under the category of &quot;abstract photography&quot; still a glass of water. we tend to name things as art which shows us different perspectives from what our eyes (biologically) usually see. take your glass of water, put in the right environment, tell people what they look at is &quot;ART&quot; and they&#039;ll believe it. But it&#039;s not. It&#039;s just a glass of water technicaly well photographed. No more. 

That&#039;s one of the reasons why photography is in general not considered as art. In most cases (even for famous photographers) is a one-way perception of our live and things around it. Nothing from the photographers emotions, expressions, impressions or whatsoever are expressed throught photographs (well would say most of them). They just capture live like we all see it  just nicely packed in technique and a frame.

Some photographers know how to use their camera to actually create-express live...most of them do not. 

Or I&#039;m totally wrong and waht we need is a completely new way and category for photography...

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heya,</p>
<p>&#8230;.a glass of water is even under the category of &#8220;abstract photography&#8221; still a glass of water. we tend to name things as art which shows us different perspectives from what our eyes (biologically) usually see. take your glass of water, put in the right environment, tell people what they look at is &#8220;ART&#8221; and they&#8217;ll believe it. But it&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s just a glass of water technicaly well photographed. No more. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the reasons why photography is in general not considered as art. In most cases (even for famous photographers) is a one-way perception of our live and things around it. Nothing from the photographers emotions, expressions, impressions or whatsoever are expressed throught photographs (well would say most of them). They just capture live like we all see it  just nicely packed in technique and a frame.</p>
<p>Some photographers know how to use their camera to actually create-express live&#8230;most of them do not. </p>
<p>Or I&#8217;m totally wrong and waht we need is a completely new way and category for photography&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
